CALL FOR PAPERS
The Fat Pedagogy Reader: Challenging Weight-Based Oppression in Education
Edited by Erin Cameron & Constance Russell, Lakehead University
(to be published in “Counterpoints” series (ed. Shirley Steinberg) for Peter Lang Publishers)
Over the last decade, concerns about ‘globesity’, referring to a global obesity epidemic, have flourished. The media is rife with hyperbolic claims about the dire consequences of obesity, and public health messages about physical activity, fitness, and nutrition permeate society. This obesity discourse serves to reproduce a framework of thinking, talking, and action where thinness is privileged and where a ‘size matters’ message fuels narratives about personal irresponsibility and lack of willpower that validates fat-phobic behaviours and practices. In response, a growing number of scholars are interrogating obesity discourse, illuminating its consequences, and discussing how it can be challenged. In this book, we wish to bring attention to the ways in which weight-based oppression occurs within spaces and places of learning. We want to develop and advocate a fat pedagogy that promotes safe learning spaces for all learners, regardless of size.
This book will make a significant contribution to the literature because there has not yet been a comprehensive examination of the pedagogical approaches used for disrupting weight-based oppression in elementary, secondary and higher education or in education in non-formal and informal settings. A growing number of scholars in education as well as in women’s studies, geography, psychology, and health, are starting to write about how weight-based oppression could be challenged. We thus want to bring together an international contingent of scholars from a diverse range of disciplines to critically examine approaches to teaching about weight-based oppression from a range of historical, social, political, and cultural contexts.
We expect this book to be of interest to scholars, educators, students, and practitioners in the fields of fat studies, critical weight studies, critical geographies of body size, critical health studies, and social justice education. It will be of particular interest and use to instructors who are teaching in the areas of education, women’s studies, public health, community health, kinesiology, nursing, nutrition, geography, and psychology, as well as interested teachers in elementary and secondary schools.
We envision the book as being made up of an extensive array of relatively short (i.e., 3000-5000 words) and accessibly written chapters that describe and analyze the pedagogical approaches used by educators from around the world who address ideas of bodies, weight, fatness, obesity, thinness, and health at any size in their teaching. The book will end with a Fat Pedagogy Manifesto and a call to action. It is time to throw our weight around, so to speak, on this important social justice issue!
We are requesting a “statement of interest” (maximum 500 words) that includes the title of the proposed submission and an abstract that provides an overview of key arguments to be made in the chapter by January 7, 2014. A decision on whether a full submission will be sought will be communicated by February 1, 2014. Full manuscripts will be due August 1, 2014.
Inquiries and statements of interest should be directed to Erin Cameron (emcarte1@lakeheadu.ca) and Connie Russell (crussell@lakeheadu.ca).
*******
And for a visual aid -- my partner, Fat Studies scholar Julia McCrossin, giving flabulous demonstrations of fat pedagogy at George Washington University a few years ago (Columbian College of Arts and Sciences, English Department):
Friday, November 22, 2013
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology - my guest lecture
Today I guest lectured for the third November in a row at the Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology (MSPP), in Jessica Stahl’s class Psychology of Diversity & Difference in the Counseling Psychology master’s program. As before, I was primarily representing Massachusetts Transgender Political Coalition (MTPC); MSPP has been having a few trans people from a few orgs in to speak every year for years, including SpeakOut. Also as before, it was pretty informal, and we had a Q&A session after. This class was quieter than the previous ones, but they had had an even better trans education before I arrived. It’s a good gig for many reasons – my fascination with psychology and the school’s recent move to Newton (my second hometown) among them. Alas, this will be my last visit to MSPP, as I am moving to DC at the end of January. My predecessor was Rachel K. Zall – yes, a tough act to follow! – who moved to Philly; it will be interesting to see who my/our successor is. And if you're in the market for trans-led, personalized trans educational services, check out MTPC's page about what we offer.
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
My partner Julia McCrossin's interview by One Plus Love
I'm finally getting around to sharing Almah LaVon's interview of my partner Julia McCrossin for Onepluslove -- about the intersectionality of queerness and fatness and more. *KVELLING*
Friday, October 11, 2013
Happy National Coming Out Day #NCOD
Well. My National Coming Out Day (#NCOD) posting prayers have been answered.
My partner Julia McCrossin: “This is my experience, the not being made fun of or criticized for my queerness, but dehumanized for my fatness. If only more people cared about my dignity and equality as a fat woman as they do for my queerness.”
Julia has written about her experience at her blog – see especially "The Rest Of The (Fat) Story".
The below article definitely has some issues – for one thing, ableism / racism / transphobia et al should have been addressed earlier and better.
I’d also like to see a lot more conversation about how actually you often do need to decide whether to come out as fat (or formerly fat, or okay with becoming / wanting to become fat/ter; or fat-allied) – like here on the internet – and how much more so, how you often need to decide whether to come out as being on the fat-positive spectrum. And how unsafe those disclosures can be. (Tolerate your doctor’s fatphobia, or disagree and risk worse treatment / no treatment?) And how that relates to the true complexity of queer outness / disclosure issues, especially for trans people.
Nu, without further ado -- Louis Peitzman's "It Gets Better, Unless You're Fat" for Buzz Feed.
Also:
Also also:
My partner Julia McCrossin: “This is my experience, the not being made fun of or criticized for my queerness, but dehumanized for my fatness. If only more people cared about my dignity and equality as a fat woman as they do for my queerness.”
Julia has written about her experience at her blog – see especially "The Rest Of The (Fat) Story".
The below article definitely has some issues – for one thing, ableism / racism / transphobia et al should have been addressed earlier and better.
I’d also like to see a lot more conversation about how actually you often do need to decide whether to come out as fat (or formerly fat, or okay with becoming / wanting to become fat/ter; or fat-allied) – like here on the internet – and how much more so, how you often need to decide whether to come out as being on the fat-positive spectrum. And how unsafe those disclosures can be. (Tolerate your doctor’s fatphobia, or disagree and risk worse treatment / no treatment?) And how that relates to the true complexity of queer outness / disclosure issues, especially for trans people.
Nu, without further ado -- Louis Peitzman's "It Gets Better, Unless You're Fat" for Buzz Feed.
Also:
Also also:
Tuesday, October 8, 2013
The MA height / weight anti-discrimination bill is moving!
Rep. Byron Rushing forwarded this to supporters today -- sorry no link, SHNS is subscription-only (?!):
(For those tuning in late, see my previous post about the bill.)
"From: State House News Service [mailto:news@statehousenews. com]

COMMITTEE BACKS BILL ADDING HEIGHT, WEIGHT TO ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW
By Colleen Quinn
STATE HOUSE NEWS SERVICE
STATE HOUSE, BOSTON, OCT. 8, 2013….Ten bills related to workers’ rights and benefits, including one that prevents discrimination based on height and weight, moved forward in the Legislature after a legislative committee voted to recommend passage of the proposals Tuesday.
Lawmakers on the Labor and Workforce Development Committee voted 7-1 in favor of recommending legislation (H 1758) filed by Rep. Byron Rushing that would add height and weight to the list of unlawful discriminatory practices prohibited by employers, labor organizations, employment agencies, landlords or real estate agents. The bill would add height and weight to the protected class descriptions, which include race, color and religious creed.
Rep. Wayne Matewsky (D-Everett) expressed concern about how the legislation would affect people who are no longer able to perform their duties because they had gained weight.
Rep. Keiko Orrall, a Republican from Lakeville, voted against advancing the bill.
Weight discrimination at work is more pervasive than race, gender or sexual orientation discrimination and increasingly considered acceptable, according to advocates who testified before the committee in June.
Dr. Scott Butsch, who works at the digestive health care center at Massachusetts General Hospital, testified in June that he has treated “countless” patients who experience weight discrimination at work. Often, they are unaware they are being discriminated against until after they lose weight and are given promotions or new opportunities at work. "I believe weight discrimination stems from the common belief that obesity is a character flaw," Butsch said during the hearing in June. Weight bias in the United States, he said, has become "socially acceptable."
Another bill that moved forward gives employment leave to victims of domestic violence, stalking and sexual assault. The bill, filed by Rep. Thomas Stanley (D-Waltham) and Sen. Cynthia Creem (D-Newton), would give workers up to 15 days leave in any 12-month period, with or without pay, if the employee or their family member is a victim of abusive behavior. Companies with 50 or more employees would be subject to the requirement, aimed at giving victims the opportunity to seek court-ordered protection, medical attention, counseling, legal assistance or housing. The bill stipulates the employee is not eligible for leave if they are the perpetrator of the abusive behavior.
The committee voted 7-1 in favor of advancing the bill, with Orrall voting against.
Committee members also voted 7-1 in favor of legislation around parental leave (H 1774/S 865), filed by Rep. Martin Walsh (D-Dorchester) and Sen. Patricia Jehlen (D-Somerville). Orrall voted no.
The bill (H 1774/S 865) would revise existing laws around maternity leave by removing the limitation that the benefit is only available to female employees. Under the bill, leave would also apply to part-time employees. It limits the probationary period for employees to be eligible to a maximum of six months.
The Labor Committee also voted in favor of legislation relative to defense against abusive waivers (H 1728/S 848), filed by Rep. Kenneth Gordon (D-Bedford) and Sen. Katherine Clark (D-Melrose); and a bill clarifying the meal break law for private enforcement (S 859).
The abusive waivers bill would add a section to state law regulating labor and industries in Massachusetts, which includes enforceable rights and procedures for employment discrimination and sexual harassment. The bill would void contractual provisions waiving any substantive or procedural right to claims of discrimination, retaliation, harassment or violation of public policy.
The meal break bill states employers cannot require an employee to work for more than six consecutive hours without allowing at least 30 minutes for a meal. Currently, the attorney general must investigate violations of the meal break law. The proposed legislation would allow employees to file lawsuits.
The committee voted unanimously in favor of legislation (S 867) filed by Sen. Brian Joyce, that would make it illegal for an employer to deny employment, reemployment, retention or promotion to a U.S. military veteran, including members of the National Guard, on the basis of their military association.
A bill filed by Rep. Joseph Wagner (D-Chicopee) providing incentives for productive workers’ compensation audits was also given a favorable recommendation by the committee, with seven members voting for it.
Current state workers compensation law requires all self-insured employers to be audited annually. There is no requirement that employers with commercial workers compensation insurance conduct audits. The proposed legislation would require all employers to be audited at least biennially, and those employers in the construction industry to be audited annually.
END
10/8/2013
Serving the working press since 1910
http://www.statehousenews.com"
(For those tuning in late, see my previous post about the bill.)
"From: State House News Service [mailto:news@statehousenews.
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 3:59 PM
To: news@statehousenews.com
Subject: COMMITTEE BACKS BILL ADDING HEIGHT, WEIGHT TO ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW
To: news@statehousenews.com
Subject: COMMITTEE BACKS BILL ADDING HEIGHT, WEIGHT TO ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW
COMMITTEE BACKS BILL ADDING HEIGHT, WEIGHT TO ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW
By Colleen Quinn
STATE HOUSE NEWS SERVICE
STATE HOUSE, BOSTON, OCT. 8, 2013….Ten bills related to workers’ rights and benefits, including one that prevents discrimination based on height and weight, moved forward in the Legislature after a legislative committee voted to recommend passage of the proposals Tuesday.
Lawmakers on the Labor and Workforce Development Committee voted 7-1 in favor of recommending legislation (H 1758) filed by Rep. Byron Rushing that would add height and weight to the list of unlawful discriminatory practices prohibited by employers, labor organizations, employment agencies, landlords or real estate agents. The bill would add height and weight to the protected class descriptions, which include race, color and religious creed.
Rep. Wayne Matewsky (D-Everett) expressed concern about how the legislation would affect people who are no longer able to perform their duties because they had gained weight.
Rep. Keiko Orrall, a Republican from Lakeville, voted against advancing the bill.
Weight discrimination at work is more pervasive than race, gender or sexual orientation discrimination and increasingly considered acceptable, according to advocates who testified before the committee in June.
Dr. Scott Butsch, who works at the digestive health care center at Massachusetts General Hospital, testified in June that he has treated “countless” patients who experience weight discrimination at work. Often, they are unaware they are being discriminated against until after they lose weight and are given promotions or new opportunities at work. "I believe weight discrimination stems from the common belief that obesity is a character flaw," Butsch said during the hearing in June. Weight bias in the United States, he said, has become "socially acceptable."
Another bill that moved forward gives employment leave to victims of domestic violence, stalking and sexual assault. The bill, filed by Rep. Thomas Stanley (D-Waltham) and Sen. Cynthia Creem (D-Newton), would give workers up to 15 days leave in any 12-month period, with or without pay, if the employee or their family member is a victim of abusive behavior. Companies with 50 or more employees would be subject to the requirement, aimed at giving victims the opportunity to seek court-ordered protection, medical attention, counseling, legal assistance or housing. The bill stipulates the employee is not eligible for leave if they are the perpetrator of the abusive behavior.
The committee voted 7-1 in favor of advancing the bill, with Orrall voting against.
Committee members also voted 7-1 in favor of legislation around parental leave (H 1774/S 865), filed by Rep. Martin Walsh (D-Dorchester) and Sen. Patricia Jehlen (D-Somerville). Orrall voted no.
The bill (H 1774/S 865) would revise existing laws around maternity leave by removing the limitation that the benefit is only available to female employees. Under the bill, leave would also apply to part-time employees. It limits the probationary period for employees to be eligible to a maximum of six months.
The Labor Committee also voted in favor of legislation relative to defense against abusive waivers (H 1728/S 848), filed by Rep. Kenneth Gordon (D-Bedford) and Sen. Katherine Clark (D-Melrose); and a bill clarifying the meal break law for private enforcement (S 859).
The abusive waivers bill would add a section to state law regulating labor and industries in Massachusetts, which includes enforceable rights and procedures for employment discrimination and sexual harassment. The bill would void contractual provisions waiving any substantive or procedural right to claims of discrimination, retaliation, harassment or violation of public policy.
The meal break bill states employers cannot require an employee to work for more than six consecutive hours without allowing at least 30 minutes for a meal. Currently, the attorney general must investigate violations of the meal break law. The proposed legislation would allow employees to file lawsuits.
The committee voted unanimously in favor of legislation (S 867) filed by Sen. Brian Joyce, that would make it illegal for an employer to deny employment, reemployment, retention or promotion to a U.S. military veteran, including members of the National Guard, on the basis of their military association.
A bill filed by Rep. Joseph Wagner (D-Chicopee) providing incentives for productive workers’ compensation audits was also given a favorable recommendation by the committee, with seven members voting for it.
Current state workers compensation law requires all self-insured employers to be audited annually. There is no requirement that employers with commercial workers compensation insurance conduct audits. The proposed legislation would require all employers to be audited at least biennially, and those employers in the construction industry to be audited annually.
END
10/8/2013
Serving the working press since 1910
http://www.statehousenews.com"
Thursday, September 19, 2013
Shana tova!!
Shana tova!! Happy 5774!!
I hope everyone who observed had awesome Days Of Awe. I did, including giving the dvar (sermon) at Congregation Am Tikva’s Kol Nidre service. As for many years, CAT had a joint Healing Service with our home Temple Sinai on Yom Kippur, and TS’ Rabbi Andy Vogel gave a mini dvar based on a Jewish teaching. This year’s, which I had encountered a few times before, but without the punchline:
“Every person should have in his/her two pockets pieces of paper with these written on them:
In one pocket: ‘For my sake was the world created’ (Mishnah, Sanhedrin 4:4).
In the other pocket: ‘I am dust and ashes’ (Genesis 18:27).
At certain times and places, you should pull out the appropriate piece of paper.
But know that most people make this mistake: They take out the wrong piece of paper at the wrong time!”
Rabbi Simcha Bunem of Przysucha (1765 - 1827)
Itturei Torah, volume 1, page 145
I hope everyone who observed had awesome Days Of Awe. I did, including giving the dvar (sermon) at Congregation Am Tikva’s Kol Nidre service. As for many years, CAT had a joint Healing Service with our home Temple Sinai on Yom Kippur, and TS’ Rabbi Andy Vogel gave a mini dvar based on a Jewish teaching. This year’s, which I had encountered a few times before, but without the punchline:
“Every person should have in his/her two pockets pieces of paper with these written on them:
In one pocket: ‘For my sake was the world created’ (Mishnah, Sanhedrin 4:4).
In the other pocket: ‘I am dust and ashes’ (Genesis 18:27).
At certain times and places, you should pull out the appropriate piece of paper.
But know that most people make this mistake: They take out the wrong piece of paper at the wrong time!”
Rabbi Simcha Bunem of Przysucha (1765 - 1827)
Itturei Torah, volume 1, page 145
Thursday, September 12, 2013
Huffington Post's "Most Inspiring LGBT Religious Leaders"
I'm #69 (ha) on the Huffington Post's list of Most Inspiring LGBT Religious Leaders, now at 91 and counting. It's still not nearly as diverse as it should or could be, and the current diversity took a lot of doing, and we still need a show of trans faith leaders, and so on. But it's something. And if you too want it to be something else, I encourage you to use the "Contribute to this story" buttons etc. underneath it.
Friday, August 16, 2013
Praise the Lard

EEEEEEE! Someone walked by me in Cambridge today wearing this or something very much like it! AMEN! Praise the Lard indeed! I know it’s intended to be more pork-positive than pig- or fat-positive – but as a queer faith leader I’m all about more positive interpretations of sacred texts. I have to show my brother who has always loved pigs.
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
Cindy Baker’s book “Fat Haircuts”

Cindy Baker’s book “Fat Haircuts” is out – and my partner Julia McCrossin is in it!
5th thumbnail; photo by moi right after a haircut.
“Hey everyone! For all those who asked, here's how to get a copy of the Fat Haircuts book! It's pretty expensive, even selling direct from the printer, but they're having a sale until the end of July for 55% off! That should make it about $70, and shipping is free if you spend at least $65! If you miss the sale, they usually give a coupon code to people who like their facebook page or follow their twitter account.
If you can't afford it, tell your library* to buy it instead!
Coupon Code: JULY55IWP”
*Boston Public Library - Jamaica Plain Branch.
Wednesday, July 17, 2013
Special issue of Fat Studies : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society re: Visual Representations of Fat and Fatness

Derp! I forgot to say that the special issue of Fat Studies : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society on Visual Representations of Fat and Fatness came out in May. And you can see 4 of the 11 parts for free. I was one of the reviewers for a piece that didn't make it -- it did need editing, but was a good idea and well done, so hopefully the writer will publish it somewhere soon. (I really wish I could tell you about it, but the writers don't know who their reviewers are, and vice versa.) And I was included in the Thanks to Reviewers.
Monday, June 24, 2013
MA height & weight anti-discrimination bill is back!
The Massachusetts height and weight anti-discrimination bill is back! And it has a hearing on Tuesday June 25th. Please read, submit testimony, attend, contact your legislators, spread the word, etc.! MA voters are most needed but everything helps. An Act Making Discrimination on the Basis of Height and Weight Unlawful (House Bill 1758) has been re-filed. It would amend MA state laws prohibiting discrimination in the areas of employment, housing, and public accommodations by adding “height” and “weight” to the list of legally protected ‘classes’. The lead sponsor is Representative Byron Rushing, a longtime and amazing social justice leader, including for transgender rights and in the Episcopal Church (the Trans Equal Rights Law passed in November 2011, the Trans Equal Access Bill was filed this January).
This legislation is very badly needed and long overdue, and has already had a long process – and it may well be a longer one. Many people here, as everywhere, are ignorant about weight and weight discrimination, and many assume weight is already included in MA law (as they should be). And there’s been very little visible local support in recent years; the primary local anti-weight-discrimination leader passed away several years ago and it seems like she hasn't been succeeded. There’s a lot of potential support, including in my queer and faith communities, but it will take a great deal of (re-)education to make it actual.
Click here for my previous posts about the bill. Thanks again to flabulous fat community leader Marilyn Wann for looping me into this a few years ago!
E-update of Tuesday May 28th (email Dave to put yourself on the list for updates):
Hi All,
Thank you for your past support and advocacy for legislation in Massachusetts to make it unlawful to discriminate based on height and weight. As you may know, Representative Rushing has again filed H. 1758, An Act Making Discrimination on the Basis of Height and Weight Unlawful during the current legislative session.
I am writing to let you know that a hearing has been scheduled for this bill on Tuesday, June 25 before the Joint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development. The hearing begins at 10:00 am in Hearing Room B-1 in the Massachusetts State House. Representative Rushing would like to invite you to provide oral or written testimony in support of this bill. Written testimony can be addressed to:
Senate Chair, Joint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development
State House, Room 511B
Boston, MA 02133
House Chair, Joint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development
State House, Room 39
Boston, MA 02133
Please reply to this email message if you are interested in providing testimony in support of the bill. If you know of others who might be interested in providing testimony in support of this legislation, please feel free to forward this email along.
I’ve attached a copy of the bill for your reference. Please feel free to contact me if I can be of any further assistance.
Best,
Dave
Dave VanderWoude
Office of Majority Whip Byron Rushing
State House, Room 235
Boston, MA 02133
E-update of Thursday June 13th (email Dave to put yourself on the list for updates):
Hi All,
I am writing to remind you of the public hearing on Tuesday, June 25, regarding H. 1758,An Act Making Discrimination on the Basis of Height and Weight Unlawful. Representative Rushing would greatly appreciate if you would be willing to provide oral and/or written testimony. Please let me know if you plan to provide testimony if you haven’t done so already.
The hearing begins at 10:00 am in Hearing Room B-1 in the Massachusetts State House and is scheduled to run until 3:00 pm. The Committee is finalizing the order in which the bills will be heard, so I will send out this list as soon as I receive it to give you a more specific estimate of when the bill will be heard. If you are unable to provide testimony in-person, you can submit written testimony by emailing the Committee Co-Chairs directly atThomas.Conroy@mahouse.gov and Daniel.Wolf@masenate.gov. Please copy me (David.VanderWoude@mahouse.gov ) on the testimony you submit.
For your reference, I’ve attached a copy of the bill and included a brief summary below.
What would this bill do?
Section 4 of Chapter 151B and Sections 92A and 98 of Chapter 272 of the Massachusetts General Laws currently state that persons cannot be discriminated against in the areas of employment, housing, and public accommodations on the basis of race, color, religious creed, national origin, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, genetic information, or ancestry.
This bill would amend these statutes to include height and weight to the list of unlawful forms of discrimination. It would provide a legal remedy to those who have experienced discrimination in employment, housing, and public accommodations based on their weight or height.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
Best,
Dave
Dave VanderWoude
Office of Majority Whip Byron Rushing
State House, Room 235
Boston, MA 02133
E-update of Thursday June 20th (email Dave to put yourself on the list for updates):
Hi All,
I am writing to remind you of next week’s hearing regarding legislation that would prohibit discrimination on the basis of height and weight. We would greatly appreciate it if you provide testimony, oral or written, in favor of this bill. The text of the bill can be foundhere.
For those of you attending the hearing, I’ve listed the order in which the bills will be heard by the Labor and Workforce Development Committee. The hearing begins at 10:00 am in Hearing Room B-1 in the Massachusetts State House and is scheduled to run until3:00 pm.
Please be in touch if you have any questions or concerns.
Best,
Dave
Bill #
|
Lead Sponsor
|
Bill Title
|
H. 2460/S. 877
|
Rep. M. Walsh / Sen. Pacheco
|
An Act extending safety precautions to employees of the executive branch of the Commonwealth
|
H. 1733
|
Rep. Jones
|
An Act to provide a safe workplace for employees of the commonwealth and its political subdivisions
|
H. 1726
|
Rep. Gobi
|
An Act providing for the protection of emergency responders from dismissal
|
H. 1773
|
Rep. M. Walsh
|
An Act clarifying patient safety precautions
|
H. 1775
|
Rep. M. Walsh
|
An Act to provide occupational safeguards for employees resulting from the introduction and utilization of video display terminals
|
S. 859
|
Sen. Eldridge
|
An Act clarifying the meal break law to allow for private enforcement
|
S. 881
|
Sen. Petruccelli
|
An Act relative to climate conditions in public schools
|
H.1702 / H. 1767
|
Rep. Calter / Rep. Story / Sen. Jehlen
|
An Act further defining comparable work
|
H. 1758
|
Rep. Rushing
|
An Act making discrimination on the basis of height and weight unlawful
|
H. 1766
|
Rep. Story / Sen. Clark
|
An Act addressing workplace bullying, mobbing, and harassment, without regard to protected class status
|
H. 1780
|
Rep. Walz
|
An Act relative to non-discrimination training in the workplace
|
H. 3231
|
Rep. Coakley-Rivera
|
An Act relative to discrimination in the workplace
|
S. 867
|
Sen. Joyce
|
An Act preventing discrimination based on veteran’s status
|
H. 1740
|
Rep. Koczera
|
An Act providing unpaid family and medical leave
|
H. 1746
|
Rep. Mark
|
An Act regulating Chapter 136
|
H. 1764 / S. 853
|
Rep. Stanley / Sen. Creem
|
An Act to establish employment leave and safety remedies to victims of domestic violence, stalking and sexual assault
|
H. 1774 / S. 865
|
Rep. M. Walsh / Sen. Jehlen
|
An Act relative to parental leave
|
H. 1718 / S. 887
|
Sen. Dorcena Forry / Sen. Rodrigues
|
An Act relative to the fair distribution of gratuities / An Act relative to the pooling of tips
|
H. 1749 / S. 862
|
Rep. Michlewitz / Sen. Hart
|
An Act to further protect an employee’s right to tips
|
My testimony, submitted Sunday June 23rd by email:
Senator Daniel A. Wolf
Senate Chair, Joint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development
State House, Room 511B
Boston, MA 02133
Representative Thomas P. Conroy
House Chair, Joint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development
State House, Room 39
Boston, MA 02133
Via email: Daniel.Wolf@masenate.gov | Thomas.Conroy@mahouse.gov
Dear Senator Wolf and Representative Conroy --
My name is Mycroft Masada Holmes, and I live and work in greater Boston, where I was born 37 years ago this month and where I have always lived. I love Boston and the rest of Massachusetts; this great city and state have always truly been my home and I hope they always will be.
I’m an interfaith leader – Chair of the Massachusetts Transgender Political Coalition’s (MTPC) Interfaith Coalition for Transgender Equality (ICTE), a Community Engagement Adviser at TransFaith, and a board member of Congregation Am Tikva. Much of my work has been in support of the Transgender Equal Rights Law and the Transgender Equal Access Bill (House Bill 1589 / Senate Bill 643).
Today, I testify in support of House Bill 1758 -- An Act Making Discrimination on the Basis of Height and Weight Unlawful. I testified in person and in writing in support of this bill (then House Bill 1850) at its hearing on January 27th of 2010; I also read the testimony of attorney Sondra Solovay, who could not attend as she was in California where she lives and usually works. I testified in writing for the bill’s hearing on July 14th of 2011 (then House Bill 539); I was unable to attend, largely due to the very short notice. I plan to attend and testify at today’s hearing.
Section 4 of Chapter 151B and Sections 92A and 98 of Chapter 272 of the Massachusetts General Laws currently state that persons cannot be discriminated against in the areas of employment, housing, and public accommodations on the basis of race, color, religious creed, national origin, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, genetic information, or ancestry.
This bill would amend these statutes to include height and weight to the list of unlawful forms of discrimination. It would provide a legal remedy to those who have experienced discrimination in employment, housing, and public accommodations based on their weight or height.
In all but one state and three cities in this country, weight is not included in anti-discrimination or hate crimes laws. How can this be? How can Massachusetts remain one of those forty-nine states? How can we not right this as soon as possible – indeed, during this legislative session?
My faiths teach that like Adam, the first human being, all people are made btzelem Elohim – in the image of God -- people of all sizes, shapes, weights and heights. Our infinite diversity of bodies and their changes over our lifetimes are gifts and blessings -- meant to be lived and shared with happiness and pride. God creates and loves all of us, equally. And all of us should be equally protected by the law.
In my personal and professional life, I have experienced, witnessed and researched a great deal of discrimination – especially in employment. Much of it has been based on physical appearance and information, particularly height and weight. This discrimination is wrong, terribly damaging to everyone involved, and occurs many times every day in every part of our state. It must be ended as soon as possible, and HB 1758 will help to end it. The bill is also an important educational tool – its implementation process will help dispel the overwhelming and rapidly growing ignorance, misinformation and phobia about height and weight. I won’t go into detail, as you will be given expert testimony about these issues from my colleagues – ample evidence of the very significant and deeply urgent need for this legislation.
My wonderful life partner Julia McCrossin and I are the same height, 5’7”, and she weighs more than twice what I do – I am in the 130s, she in the 300s; I have always been thin, she has always been fat. Despite a lifetime of discrimination and other mistreatment, much of it based on her weight, Julia has been largely happy and healthy, and a good and productive citizen. She is a published and active English and Fat Studies academic, a volunteer at her local animal shelter and a loving dog owner, and a devoted daughter to her disabled mother. She has been and is a tremendous gift and blessing to her family, friends, colleagues, teachers, students, and all those who have been fortunate enough to know her, or indeed know of her.
Julia is a native and lifelong resident of Maryland and Washington DC – where the Human Rights Laws include height and weight in “physical appearance”. She has visited me here in Massachusetts several times over the four years we’ve been partnered. We are considering making our home here, and in any case will visit, and have much to offer my great state. But we are both challenged by discrimination, especially in employment. We need An Act Making Discrimination On The Basis Of Height And Weight Unlawful to pass into law, and soon.
I want my partner to have full civil rights whenever she’s here, and wherever she is. I want her to be able to continue to live, work and play better than she has done, contributing even more to her society than she has. I want this for all residents of and visitors to Massachusetts. I don’t want anyone to experience discrimination – and yet I know that some will, and I want them to be able to take appropriate action. I urge you to do everything you can to pass this vital and long overdue legislation during this session.
Thank you,
Mycroft Holmes
{home and e-mail addresses}
Cc: Dave VanderWoude
Office of Majority Whip Byron Rushing
State House, Room 235
Boston, MA 02133
Via email: david.vanderwoude@mahouse.gov
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





